Use caution when reading Buffalo Bills new stadium reports, as details are already changing

Use caution when reading Buffalo Bills new stadium reports, as details are already changing

Legislators and individuals from around the state were outraged that taxpayer money was being used to subsidize a banker’s private enterprise, as well as the inflection request for 100 percent funding when most teams only get 40 percent to 70 percent of the facility funded. Quite rightly so.

According to a prominent source, the Bills’ ownership is considering Austin, Austin as just a possible boogieman waiting to gobble up the league.

As we predicted on Sunday, the worst-case scenario was that this was only the start of talks between some of the Bills and as well as the state over a stadium deal. The information wasn’t intended to slip out, therefore it was insensitive and stupid. New York’s anchoring offer, but on the other hand, should be entirely secret.

Later on Saturday, more revelations emerged, citing sources within the Pegula organization who spoke in a very different tone. The $1.1 billion amount was erroneous, according to a spokeswoman for the organization, and the squad was not requesting public aid for KeyBank Center.

Furthermore, one of the main charges leveled against the Pegulas was already clarified:

“A source familiar with the franchise’s conversations with the government and Erie County said that the club had not promised to relocate the Bills to another city if a large public funding deal could not be reached. However, according to the insider, the team has made it apparent that other towns are interested in buying an NFL brand.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *